• Home
  • Contact
  • About Me
Paul Seabright

.com

  • Home
  • About Me
  • Books
  • Research
    • New Research
    • Working Papers
    • Published Journal Articles
    • Published Book Chapters
    • Current Research
    • Ideas for Future Research
    • Collaborators and Co-authors
    • Conferences
  • Other Writing
  • Lectures, Podcasts, Teaching
  • Coups de Coeur
    • Visual Artists
    • Places
    • Recommended Books
    • Blogs and links
    • Curiosities
  • Français

Browsing Category Teaching

Teaching

In the academic year 2024-25 I am teaching the following courses at TSE:

In the Winter semester:

The Long Run History of Trade (outline), M2 program for PPD and EEE, Tuesdays at 14h-15h30 and Thursdays at 9h30-11h in MH 202, beginning on 7th January 2025.

Economics of Religious Competition, PhD program, Mondays at 9h30-12h30 for five weeks in TSE Auditorium 6, beginning on 13th January 2025.

Module “The Economic Impact of Immigration”, in 2nd-year undergraduate program (in French), Fridays at 12h30-14h for four weeks, beginning on 24th January 2025.

In the Fall semester I taught:

Evolution of Economic Behavior (outline).

Understanding Real World Organizations (outline).

Causal Inference – jointly with Mateo Montenegro (outline).

Any enquiries about material for any of these courses should be directed to Paul.Seabright@tse-fr.eu.

Microeconomics for all

This is the title given by Project Syndicate to my op-ed piece about microeconomics teaching. The home page of the INET curriculum project is here.

Sensitive Markets

On 11th September 2013 I asked students in my Markets and Organizations class to fill in a questionnaire about their attitudes to undertaking various activities in exchange for money, including buying and selling bodily organs, sexual services, weapons, drugs, votes, grades in class, and several other items. The results were very interesting. In particular the questionnaire distinguished between believing that certain exchanges should be illegal, believing that they are immoral, and feeling personally uncomfortable about undertaking them. It also distinguished between buying and selling.

The questionnaire, and an analysis of the results, can be downloaded here.

Some highlights:

1)   Most items have more people feeling uncomfortable than those who morally disapprove, and more who morally disapprove than would want to ban the transaction. Exceptions include drugs and guns which, interestingly, have substantially fewer people believing it is immoral to buy them than think it should be illegal to buy them. This may reflect a view that these items pose challenges to self-control, and that the law is there partly to protect people from themselves.

2)   Drugs and (to a lesser extent) handguns also display a striking difference between the perceived immorality of buying and selling, with respondents disapproving much less of buyers than of sellers.

3)   In most other cases there is not much systematic difference between responses about buying and those about selling, at least as far as illegality and immorality are concerned. But people tend to feel more uncomfortable about selling than about buying.

4)   Trade in sex makes people feel very uncomfortable – more than anything else, except buying grades in class – even though only around a third want to ban such trade. More want to criminalize selling than buying sex, which runs counter to recent legal changes implemented in Sweden and under discussion in France.

5)   Trade in votes and trade in grades provoke the most consistently negative scores across modes.

 

There were some interesting national differences (not in the table). Most nationalities were too small in number to be a representative sample, but there were 42 French respondents and 12 Germans:

On whether it is immoral to buy sexual services, 30 out of 42 French respondents say “yes” but only 2 out of 12 Germans (though 11 out of 12 are “uncomfortable” with the idea). Incidentally, the Belgians side with the Germans and not with the French on this.

On whether the sale of handguns should be illegal, only 25 out of 40 French respondents say “yes” (2 blank responses) but 11 out of 12 Germans.

On whether the sale of surrogacy services should be illegal, 16 out of 38 French respondents say “yes” (4 blanks) but only 1 out of 12 Germans.

 

The image featured on this post is from an article in The Guardian entitled “Why Men Use Prostitutes”, and the image corroborates one finding of the questionnaire, which is that sex is probably the topic that makes most respondents feel uncomfortable when discussing buying and selling. The Guardian article reports a study, available here, which discusses motivations of men who buy commercial sexual services.

What’s the Use of Economics? Teaching the Dismal Science After the Crisis

This book of essays edited by the excellent Diane Coyle was published on 15th September 2012; the Amazon page is here. Diane also has a column posted on Vox.

I have a very short note in it but many of the other entries are fuller and more rewarding to read.

  • Tags

    artists BBC behavioural economics book cambridge university press central europe church company of strangers competition policy Covid-19 darwin darwin college lecture economists epidemics experiments feminism fiction Français gender Haiti histoire historians History jointventure lockdown marriage markets narrative networks podcast princeton Psychology radio regions of europe religion récit sexual selection supply chain teaching technology trade tribune Trust videos war of the sexes whimsy
  • Connect with us:
  • © 2025 Paul Seabright
  • Powered by WordPress